MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Free energy of WALP23 dimer association in DMPC, DPPC, and DOPC bilayers

2013· article· en· W1965548701 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry and Physics of Lipids · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta Innovates - Health SolutionsAlberta Innovates - Technology Futures
KeywordsChemistryAntiparallel (mathematics)DimerLipid bilayerCrystallographyHelix (gastropod)MembraneMolecular dynamicsMonomerBiophysicsComputational chemistryBiochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The MARTINI coarse-grained model is used to gain insight into the association of WALP23 helices in three different lipid membranes: DMPC, DPPC and DOPC. Potentials of mean force describing the association of two WALP23 helices embedded in different lipid bilayers indicate no barrier of association and a stabilization of more than 20 kJ mol(-1) of the associated state relative to the fully dissociated state. Association is strongest in DMPC, followed by DPPC and DOPC. Helix-helix association appears to be enthalpically favorable in all lipid bilayers, while the entropic contribution appears favorable only in the presence of significant positive hydrophobic mismatch, in DMPC lipids. The interpretation of this requires care given the coarse-grained nature of the simulations, but the sign of the thermodynamic quantities agrees with experimental measurements on dimerization of (AALALAA)3 peptides and the observed association free energies are within the experimental range. Both protein-protein and lipid-lipid interactions appear to strongly favor protein dimerization, while the interactions between a dimer and lipid are unfavorable relative to the interactions between two separated monomers and lipids. Dimers with antiparallel orientation appear to be thermodynamically favored over parallel dimers, particularly in conditions of greater hydrophobic mismatch, but elucidating the detailed origin of this likely requires simulations of helices for which there is structural data on the dimer. We analyze 3D density, membrane order, and membrane thickness maps using new freely available analysis programs. Although these properties differ somewhat for each lipid, perturbations extend to about 1 nm for lipid density, ~2 nm for ordering and ~2.5 nm for thickness. A striking feature is the appearance and extent of systematic density fluctuations around the helices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.413

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it