Turbulence Anisotropy Determined by Wind Profiler Radar and Its Correlation with Rain Events in Montreal, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Turbulence inhomogeneities at 3-m scales can be either isotropic or anisotropic, and the degree of anisotropy can be measured with VHF wind profiler radars. Studies over a period of two years in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, have shown that for this site during nonwinter months, the occurrence of isotropic turbulence at 3-m scales serves as a useful diagnostic for the occurrence of rainfall. Turbulent eddies are expected to be most isotropic when wind shears are weak and the atmosphere is either unstable or close to instability. The measurements show that when the turbulence is most isotropic, rainfall is very common. Furthermore, the development of quasi-isotropic turbulence usually occurs before the onset of precipitation. Lead times are typically of the order of 1 to 6 h. Correlation coefficients between the occurrence of strong isotropy and the development of rain generally exceed 0.6, and can be as high as 0.7. Further studies will be required to determine whether this phenomenon is specific to the Montreal area, or can be applied to other locations as well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".