MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965585129 · doi:10.1615/jpormedia.v7.i2.20

A Numerical Investigation of Catalytic Oxidation of Very Lean Methane-Air Mixtures within a Packed-Bed Reactor

2004· article· en· W1965585129 on OpenAlexaff
L. B. Younis, I. Wierzba

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Porous Media · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCatalytic Processes in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgarySNC-Lavalin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPacked bedMethaneThermodynamicsCatalytic combustionMass transferMaterials scienceThermal conductionHeat transferCatalysisCombustionAnaerobic oxidation of methaneChemistryMechanicsPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryPhysicsChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A model for the combustion of methane-air mixtures in the presence of a catalyst in a packed-bed reactor has been developed. The one-dimensional model accounts for both gas-phase (homogeneous) and catalytic surface (heterogeneous) reactions. These reactions are modeled as single-step reactions of the Arrhenius type. Heat transfer by conduction, convection, and radiation has also been included. The governing equations, which are solved numerically, are the unstead-state equations of conservation of mass, chemical species, and energy for both solid and gas phases, which are assumed not to be in local thermal equilibrium. The results of a numerical investigation conducted with methane as a fuel and platinum as a catalyst are presented for a range of operational conditions, such as inlet temperatures (700−1,300 K), approach velocities (1−3 m/s), and equivalence ratios (0.15−0.50). The calculated values of methane conversion within the packed-bed reactor showed good agreement with some corresponding experimental data obtained for similar conditions. The preliminary results of the numerical investigation showed that the oxidation of methane in such a reactor can be modeled adequately.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Porous MediaSame topicCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207