MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965615715 · doi:10.1139/b07-032

Calcium oxalate crystals in tribe Galegeae (Leguminosae) including foliar crystal macropattern development in Caragana frutex

2007· article· en· W1965615715 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nels R. Lersten, Harry T. Horner

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Botany · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animals
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIowa State University
KeywordsHerbariumCaraganaTribeCalcium oxalateBotanyCrystal (programming language)TrichomeBiologyCrystallizationAnatomyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Galegeae was reported in 1987 to be unique among papilionoid tribes because calcium oxalate crystals were shown to be mostly lacking. We surveyed leaves of 45 species from 20 genera, mostly from herbarium specimens. A living species ( Caragana frutex (L.) K. Koch) with crystals was also studied developmentally, important because only three other species have been similarly studied. Herbarium specimens and various stages of C. frutex leaflets were bleached, dehydrated, cleared in alcohol–xylol, and made permanent. Freehand sections of C. frutex were mounted in glycerine. Crystals were detected microscopically and are generally lacking among Galegeae genera. This supports tentative contemporary opinion that the tribe is unnatural. Crystals provide new, potentially useful systematic data. Variously differing unicellular trichomes were also described in the survey. Caragana frutex leaflets have a previously undescribed macropattern development: crystals form only along veins, except for late-season prisms in scattered palisade parenchyma. Crystals form progressively base to apex, first following along successive major veins from midvein to margin and then in later-developing smaller veins, progressing acropetally. The midvein remains almost crystal-free until leaflets are at or near full size. Crystal macropattern development in C. frutex leaflets suggests that crystallization may be influenced by the whole organ, as well as by individual cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BotanySame topicAluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animalsFrench-language works237,207