The Effect of Pollution on Scope for Growth in the Pearl Oyster, Pteria aegyptiaca, in the Gulf of Aqaba, Jordan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This experiment was conducted to assess the effects of pollution on both the physiological and energetic characteristics (SFG) of Pteria aegyptiaca in the Gulf of Aqaba, Jordan. Four locations were chosen to represent both contaminated and uncontaminated locations. Phosphate Loading Berth (P) and the Industrial Area (I), represent contaminated locations, whilst the Hotels Area (H) and Marine Science Station (M) represent uncontaminated locations. The results of this experiment showed that contaminated regions had significant effects (P < 0.05) on respiration rate, clearance rate and absorption efficiency. A significant difference (P < 0.05) was identified between the scopes for growth of animals transplanted in contaminated regions compared with animals from uncontaminated locations. The Phosphate Loading Berth (P) and Industrial Area (I), showed the lowest SFG (18.7 ± 4.591 and 35.94 ± 7.412 Jh-1 respectively), reduced to only a half of SFG compared to uncontaminated locations. Results from our study indicate that oysters exposed to contaminated regions are highly compromised in both their energetics and physiology. Failure to improve the environmental conditions in these regions may have catastrophic effects on the micro and macro fauna.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".