Structure, Composition, and Maturation of Newly Deposited Calcium-Phosphate Crystals in Chicken Osteoblast Cell Cultures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Characterization of the very early calcium phosphate (CaP) crystals deposited in bone or in osteoblast cell cultures has been hampered by the overwhelming presence of organic matrix components and cells that obscure spectral analyses. We have overcome this problem using isolated protein-free crystals and have obtained new data including 31P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra for the first time from mineral crystals deposited during osteoblast calcification in culture. Crystals were isolated from cultures at two time points: (a) at first calcium accumulation (day 8-10) and (b) after 60 days of culture, to assess maturational changes. The analyses show that the chemical composition overall and short range order of the early and mature crystals are characteristic of the apatite crystals found in young embryonic chick bone in vivo. No mineral phase other than apatite was detected by any of the methods used. 31P NMR spectroscopy identified the HPO4 groups as those present in bone apatite. Similar to bone apatites, no OH groups were detected by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The temporal maturational changes in composition and structure of the mineral phase were difficult to assess because of the continuous deposition of crystals throughout culturing. The pathway of the maturational changes observed were similar to those occurring in chick bone in vivo and synthetic apatite crystals in vitro although to a much smaller extent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".