Column buckling of multiwalled carbon nanotubes with interlayer radial displacements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An elastic model is presented for column buckling of a multiwalled carbon nanotube embedded within an elastic medium. The emphasis is placed on the role of interlayer radial displacements between adjacent nanotubes. In contrast to an existing model which treats the entire multiwalled nanotube as a single column, the present model treats each of the nested tubes as an individual column interacting with adjacent nanotubes through the intertube van der Waals forces. Based on this model, a condition is derived in terms of the parameters describing the van der Waals interaction, under which the effect of the noncoincidence of all deflected column axes is so small that it does not virtually affect the critical axial strain. In particular, this condition is met for carbon multiwalled nanotubes provided that the half-wavelength of the buckling mode is much larger than the outermost diameter. In this case, the critical axial strain can be predicted correctly by the existing single-column model. On the other hand, the existing model could overestimate the critical axial strain when the half-wavelength of the buckling mode is close to or smaller than the outermost radius.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".