Type V OI Primary Osteoblasts Display Increased Mineralization Despite Decreased<i>COL1A1</i>Expression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CONTEXT: Patients with type V osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) are heterozygous for a dominant IFITM5 c.-14C>T mutation, which adds five residues to the N terminus of bone-restricted interferon-induced transmembrane-like protein (BRIL), a transmembrane protein expressed in osteoblasts. Type V OI skeletal findings include hyperplastic callus formation, ossification of the forearm interosseous membrane, and dense metaphyseal bands. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the role of osteoblasts in the active mineralization traits of type V OI and the effect of the IFITM5 mutation on type I collagen. METHODS: We identified eight patients with the IFITM5 c.-14C>T mutation. Cultured osteoblasts from type V OI patients were used to study osteoblast differentiation and mineralization. RESULTS: We verified the expression and stability of mutant IFITM5 transcripts. In differentiated type V OI primary osteoblasts in culture, the IFITM5 expression and BRIL level is comparable with control. Both early and late markers of osteoblast differentiation are increased in type V OI osteoblasts. Mineralization, assayed by alizarin red staining, was increased in type V OI osteoblasts compared with control. However, type V OI osteoblasts have significantly decreased COL1A1 transcripts in mid- to late differentiation. Type I collagen protein is concomitantly decreased, with decreased cross-linked collagen in matrix and altered appearance of fibrils deposited in culture. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that type V OI mineralization has a gain-of-function mechanism at the osteoblast level, which likely underlies the overactive tissue mineralization seen in patients. Decreased type I collagen expression, secretion, and matrix incorporation establish type V OI as a collagen-related defect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".