MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Collection: Gestion des paradoxes dans les organisations: Tomes cinq à huit

2000· article· fr· W1965704942 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jacques Barrette

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration · 2000
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé L'Association de psychologie du travail de langue française publiait en 1998, 199 articles groupés sous huit tomes et présentant les réflexions et les résultats des chercheurs francophories de plusieurs pays. Les quatre premiers tomes ont été préserités dans un numéro précédent. Les tomes 5 à 8 seront couverts dans cette revue. Les écrits de ces tomes donnent au Iecteur l'occasion d'explorer de multiples facettes des domaines couverts par la psychologie industrielle et orgariisationnelle. Dam le tome 5 les auteurs s'interrogent sur le sew du travail pour différentes catégories de personnes dont les femmes, les jeunes et les personnes en chômage. Le tome 6 s'intéresse à un sujet de grande actualité soit la mobilisation et l'efficacité au travail. Plusieurs auteurs présentent leurs réflexions et leurs résultats en ce qui a trait aux facteurs qiii mobilisent et démobilisent, ainsi que les conséquences sur la productivité de l'organisation. Dans le tome 7, plusieurs auteurs soulèvent le fait que les décisions organisationnelles sont souvent prises sans considération des impacts sur les ressources humaines. Le lecteur trouve dans ce tome une série d'articles empiriques et de réflexion sur les conséquences des changements organisationnels sur le stress et la santé. Les sujets du tome 8 touchent l'insertion socio‐professionnelle, l'équilibre travail‐famille, la santé et la sécurité, la culture organisationnelle et l'analyse du discours comme méthode d'investigationnelle psychologie du travail. La richesse et l'originalité des textes éclairent le lecteur sur des réalités cachées qui dominent dans certaines organisations et orientent leur fonctionnment. Abstract The “Association de psychologie du travail de langue francaise” published, in 1998, 199 articles grouped under eight tomes, presenting the reflection and results of researchers from French countries. The first four tomes have been presented in a previous edition. Tomes 5 to 8 are being covered in this review. The studies in these last four tomes provide an opportunity to the reader to explore many facets of different fields covered by organisational and industrial psychology. In tome 5 the authors are questioning the meaning of work for different categories of people such as women, youth and unemployed. Tome 6 covers a subject of great interest, which is mobilisation and work eficiency. The authors present their thoughts and results on the different factors that impact on mobilisation and demobilisation, and their consequences on the organisation's productivity. In tome 7, the authors are raising the fact that many organisational decisions are often made without consideration of the impact on its human resources. The reader will find in this tome empirical and theoretical articles dealing with the consequences of organisational change on the level of stress and health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.171

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.014
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration→Same topicSocial Sciences and Governance→French-language works237,207→