MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965715985 · doi:10.1071/rdv24n1ab128

128 BOVINE SEMINAL PLASMA INDUCES OVULATION IN LLAMAS

2011· article· en· W1965715985 on OpenAlexaffabout
Paula Tríbulo, O. A. Bogle, Gregory P. Adams

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvulationTheriogenologyInternal medicineEndocrinologyAndrologyCorpus luteumBiologyMedicineHormoneReproductive technologyEmbryoCryopreservation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ovulation-inducing factor (OIF) is a protein present in the seminal plasma of several species, including llamas, alpacas, pigs, cattle, sheep, horses and rabbits. In an initial study (Ratto et al. 2006 Theriogenology66, 1102–1106), bovine seminal plasma induced ovulations in 26% (5/19) of llamas compared with 0% (0/19) in the placebo group, but induced proportionately less than in llamas treated with alpaca or llama seminal plasma (100%). It is important to highlight that treatments were based on volume of seminal plasma; the actual dose of OIF was unknown. In a later study (Tanco et al. 2011 Biol. Reprod. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.111.091876), OIF from llama seminal plasma had a dose-dependent effect on ovulation rate, corpus luteum (CL) diameter and progesterone production in llamas. The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that bovine seminal plasma induces ovulation and CL development in llamas comparable with that of llama seminal plasma, based on total dose of OIF. Within species, seminal plasma was pooled from 1 to 4 ejaculates per male (n = 145 bulls, n = 4 llamas). The concentration of OIF in the pooled seminal plasma was measured by radioimmunoassay and the volume of seminal plasma used for treatment was adjusted to reach a total dose of 250 µg of OIF. Mature female llamas were assigned randomly to 4 groups and given a single intramuscular dose of 10 mL of PBS (negative control, n = 5), 50 µg of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH; positive control, n = 5), 6 mL of llama seminal plasma (n = 6), or 12 mL of bull seminal plasma (n = 6). Ovulation and CL development were monitored by transrectal ultrasonography. The incidence of ovulation was compared among groups by Fisher's exact test. Nonserial data (i.e. follicle size at treatment, maximum CL diameter, day of maximum CL diameter and first day of CL detection) were compared among groups by ANOVA. The diameter of the preovulatory follicle at treatment did not differ among groups (P = 0.10). The incidence of ovulation was 0/5, 4/5, 3/6 and 4/6 in the groups treated with PBS, GnRH, llama seminal plasma and bovine seminal plasma, respectively (P < 0.05). The incidence of ovulation did not differ among llamas treated with GnRH, llama seminal plasma, or bovine seminal plasma. Among the treatments that elicited ovulation, neither the maximum CL diameter nor the day of maximum CL diameter differed (P = 0.30 and P = 0.24, respectively). In addition, no difference was detected in the day of first detection of the CL (P = 0.25). Results document the bioactivity of OIF in the bovine seminal plasma of Bos taurus. These findings further support the notion that OIF is highly conserved among mammals and that seminal plasma exerts its effect in an OIF dose-related manner. This research was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.674
Threshold uncertainty score0.238

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207