MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965751743 · doi:10.1039/b003031g

Optical spectroscopy of nanocrystalline cubic Y2O3:Er3+ obtained by combustion synthesis

2000· article· en· W1965751743 on OpenAlexafffund
John A. Capobianco, Fiorenzo Vetrone, Tania D'Alesio, G. Tessari, Adolfo Speghini, Marco Bettinelli

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence Properties of Advanced Materials
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNanocrystalline materialNanocrystalMaterials scienceExcited stateAnalytical Chemistry (journal)SpectroscopyPhoton upconversionEmission intensityIntensity (physics)Emission spectrumSpectral lineDopingNanotechnologyAtomic physicsChemistryOpticsOptoelectronicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the emission and upconversion spectra and the lifetimes of Er3+ doped Y2O3 nanocrystalline and bulk samples. We found that when the nanocrystal and bulk samples of Y1.80Er0.20O3 were excited at 815 nm, the overall emission intensity was stronger for the bulk sample. However, the relative intensity of the (2H11/2, 4S3/2)→4I15/2/4F9/2→4I15/2 transitions is 2:3 and 3:2 for the nanocrystal and bulk sample, respectively. The decay times obtained for the nanocrystalline samples are in general significantly faster than those observed for the bulk sample. We attribute this to the adsorption of CO2 on the surface of the nanocrystalline samples. The effect of Er3+ concentration on the decay time of the nanocrystalline samples is also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations193
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Chemistry Chemical PhysicsSame topicLuminescence Properties of Advanced MaterialsFrench-language works237,207