Quantifying pulmonary hypertension in ventilated infants with bronchiolitis: A pilot study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether previously well infants ventilated for bronchiolitis have sufficiently elevated pulmonary artery pressures (PAP) to warrant a trial of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) therapy. METHODS: Consecutive infants mechanically ventilated for bronchiolitis were offered Doppler echocardiography between 24 and 72 h after intubation. Patients were divided into those with normal PAP, mild, moderate or severe pulmonary hypertension. Patients with at least moderate pulmonary hypertension (systolic PAP > 30 mmHg and > 50% of systemic systolic arterial pressure) were offered a 60 min trial of iNO therapy at a concentration of 20 ppm and repeat echocardiography. RESULTS: Six infants (four preterm, two term) were studied at a mean corrected age of 13 weeks (4, 24). Respiratory syncytial virus was confirmed on immunofluorescence of nasal secretions in five of six subjects (84%). Echocardiography was performed (mean, 5.5 days) (95%CI 3.8-7.3) after the onset of symptoms. All patients had structurally normal hearts. Four patients had mild pulmonary artery hypertension and two had normal pulmonary artery pressures. None of the patients qualified for iNO therapy. The mean (range) duration of intubation was 14 days (9-19) and the duration of hospitalization was 28 days (14-42). All patients recovered. CONCLUSION: Significant pulmonary hypertension should not be presumed in previously well preterm and term infants ventilated for bronchiolitis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".