Role of the Rab11-Associated Intracellular Pool of Receptors Formed by Constitutive Endocytosis of the β Isoform of the Thromboxane A<sub>2</sub>Receptor (TPβ)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intracellular trafficking pathways of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), following their agonist-induced endocytosis and their consequences on receptor function, are the subject of intense research efforts. However, less is known regarding their constitutive endocytosis. We previously demonstrated that the beta isoform of the thromboxane A(2) receptor (TPbeta) undergoes constitutive and agonist-induced endocytosis. Constitutive endocytosis of GPCRs can lead to the formation of an intracellular pool of receptors from which they can recycle back to the cell surface. In the present report, we show with the help of two TPbeta mutants (TPbeta-Y339A and TPbeta-I343A) specifically deficient in constitutive endocytosis that this intracellular pool of receptors serves to maintain agonist sensitivity over prolonged receptor stimulation in HEK293 cells. Second messenger generation by the TPbeta-Y339A and TPbeta-I343A mutants was drastically reduced compared to the wild-type receptor as suggested by dose-response and time-course experiments of inositol phosphates production following agonist treatment, despite normal coupling between the receptors and the Galpha(q) protein. Moreover, second messenger production after receptor activation was dramatically reduced when cells were pretreated with monensin, a recycling inhibitor. Receptor cell surface expression and endocytosis experiments further revealed that the small GTPase Rab11 protein is a determinant factor in controlling TPbeta recycling back to the cell surface. Co-localization experiments performed by immunofluorescence microscopy indicated that both constitutive and agonist-triggered endocytosis resulted in targeting of TPbeta to the Rab11-positive recycling endosome. Thus, we provide evidence that constitutive endocytosis of TPbeta forms a pool of receptors in the perinuclear recycling endosome from which they recycle to the cell surface, a process involved in preserving receptor sensitivity to agonist stimulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".