Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resume: Six cent quatre vingt cinq journalistes sont presents aux Jeux olympiques de Paris, en 1924. La francophonie concerne 224 personnes, dont 185 Francais, 18 Suisses et 17 Belges. L'analyse comparee de cette presse au Quebec, en Belgique et en Suisse, met en evidence une assez faible couverture mediatique des Jeux. Le regard porte sur les resultats et sur l'organisation parisienne varie fortement d'un pays a l'autre en fonction de l'etat des relations avec la France. Les critiques contre les organisateurs, globalement limitees, sont ainsi plus fortes en Suisse romande oA¹ les affaires politiques du moment - les zones franches et les desaccords au niveau de la Societe des Nations - enveniment en partie les relations avec l'Hexagone. En France, l'analyse des presses nationales indique qu'elles reproduisent les grandes divisions politiques du pays. L'etude des multiples journaux regionaux permet enfin d'observer toute une gamme d'articles allant de l'indifference a la critique, en fonction de la place du sport dans les zones concernees. Mots cle: Jeux olympiques, presse, francophonie OS JOGOS OLIMPICOS DE 1924 E A IMPRENSA FRANCOFONA Resumo: Seiscentos e oitenta e cinco jornalistas estiveram presentes aos Jogos Olimpicos de Paris, em 1924, do quais 224, especialmente da Franca (186), Suica (18) e Belgica (17), eram de paises francofonos. A analise comparative deste processo no Quebec, na Belgica e na Suica revela uma cobertura dos jogos relativamente baixa. A informacao e os comentarios sobre os resultados esportivos, assim como a organisacao parisiense, variaram muito de pais a outro, de acordo com suas relacoes com a Franca. As criticas aos organizadores foram em geral limitadas, porem foram mais acentuadas na Suica francofona, onde as questoes politicas da epoca - desacordos sobre zonas livres e a Liga das Nacoes - poluiram parcialmente as relacoes com a Franca. A analise da imprensa nacional francesa destaca o fato de que ela reproduzia as principais divisoes politicas do pais. Por fim, o estudo dos jornais locais franceses mostra que nao havia unidade, com jornais indo da indiferenca a critica, de acordo com a posicao do esporte na referente area geografica. Palavras-Chave: Jogos Olimpicos, imprensa, francofonia THE OLYMPIC GAMES OF 1924 AND THE FRENCH-SPEAKING PRESS Abstract: Six hundred eighty five journalists were present at the Olympic Games of Paris, in 1924, among which 224, especially from France (186), Switzerland (18) and Belgium (17), belonged to French speaking countries. The comparative analysis of this press in Quebec, Belgium and Switzerland reveals a relatively low coverage of the Games. The information and comments on both the sport results and the Parisian organisation varied strongly from a country to another according to their relationships to France. The criticisms against the organisers were globally limited, but were stronger in Frenchspeaking Switzerland, where the political affaires of the time - disagreements on free zones and on the Society of Nations - polluted partially the relations with France. The analysis of the French national press highlights the fact that it reproduced the main political divisions of the country. Finally, the study of the French local newspapers shows no unity, with papers going from indifference to criticism, according to the place of sport in the geographical concerned area. Keywords: Olympic Games, press, French speaking countries
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".