Cockayne syndrome in three sisters with varying clinical presentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report three sisters showing the clinical features and investigational findings of Cockayne syndrome (CS). In the rehabilitation unit of Northwest Armed Forces Hospital (N.W.A.F.H.), Tabuk, Saudi Arabia, there was a 12-year-old girl with typical features of CS. The girl had no apparent problems until the end of the first year when growth and developmental delay prompted medical evaluation. Brain CT, bone X-rays, auditory and ophthalmological evaluation confirmed the clinical impression of Cockayne syndrome. Two of her 13 sibs, both sisters, were later found to have the same syndrome. The sisters varied in clinical severity, as two of them had cataracts and early global delay and died early of inanition and infection. The third showed the disease manifestations at a relatively later age, did not have cataract, exhibited milder manifestations of the disease, and remains alive. The parents are not related by any way and the father is married to two other wives with 11 unaffected children. This report documents variable degrees of manifestations in sibs who presumably have the same gene mutation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".