Rhinoconjunctivitis, bronchial responsiveness, and atopy as determinants for incident non‐work‐related asthma symptoms in apprentices exposed to high‐molecular‐weight allergens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the role of rhinoconjunctivitis (RC), taking into account atopy and the level of bronchial responsiveness to methacholine, on the incidence of respiratory symptoms and in the development and/or worsening of asthma. METHODS: We examined data from a prospective study in 769 students starting exposure to high-molecular-weight occupational allergens and who were serially followed for up to 44 months. RESULTS: The presence of RC symptoms at baseline was significantly associated with an increased risk of developing shortness of breath and wheezing in atopic subjects regardless of PC20 level and in subjects with a PC20 <or= 32 mg/ml regardless of atopic status. RC symptoms were significantly associated with the development of exercise-induced respiratory symptoms. Multivariate analyses indicated that having a measurable PC20 was significantly associated with the incidence of all respiratory symptoms studied, whereas baseline seasonal RC was associated only with incident exercise-induced respiratory symptoms; atopy played a minimal role, and only through an interaction with seasonal RC. CONCLUSION: Of the three potential factors for the development of respiratory symptoms that we considered, i.e. RC symptoms, having a measurable PC20 and atopy, having a measurable PC20 is the most significant one.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".