MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965955368 · doi:10.2118/170491-ms

ECD Management Solves Lost Circulation Issues in Cementing Narrow Pressure Window: A Case Study

2014· article· en· W1965955368 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsSchlumberger (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLost circulationDrilling fluidCasingPetroleum engineeringNewtonian fluidMechanicsFluid dynamicsHerschel–Bulkley fluidCementMaterials sciencePressure dropNon-Newtonian fluidGeotechnical engineeringGeologyComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Zonal isolation in narrow pressure windows has traditionally been challenging. This is due to cement slurry losses or potential fluid flow after cement placement. Accurate pressure data are essential for well control and successful primary cementing. Higher fluid densities and pumping rates can lead to induced fracture and lost circulation. Often, to mitigate the potential for dynamic losses during cement placement, low-density Newtonian fluids (preflush) are pumped ahead of weighted spacers. It is recognized in the industry that Newtonian fluids achieve a turbulent flow regime much easier than non-Newtonian fluids. The impact of Newtonian fluids on the stability of nonaqueous fluid (NAF) systems and weighted spacers are often disregarded during cement job design and testing. During cement placement, especially in extended reach wells, depending on the volume of preflush needed to maintain adequate wellbore security, a long column of preflush/mud interface may be created. With the Newtonian phase in turbulent flow, the erodability of the mud interface increases significantly. Though preferred for cementing, Newtonian fluids have a detrimental effect on the stability of the fluid interface. Whenever the yield point of the interface falls below the critical value for solids suspension or the slip velocity, weighting material sags out of the mud; this results in hydrostatic imbalance in the fluid column. When the overall hydrostatic pressure falls below the formation pressure at any point in the wellbore, the cement slurry will be invaded by formation fluid influx and a flow pathway created while cement is setting. This channel can become a flow path for hydrocarbons to the surface, leading to sustained casing pressure or a hydrocarbon seep to surface or seabed. In the Caspian region, an engineering approach was implemented to manage cementing equivalent circulating densities (ECD) when designing cement jobs using lighter and Newtonian fluids ahead of weighted spacers. It has led to successful zonal isolation for recent wells and an evaluation of design considerations for cementing ERD wells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it