Trophic ecology of siphonostomatoid copepods at deep-sea hydrothermal vents in the northeast Pacific
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MEPS Marine Ecology Progress Series Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsTheme Sections MEPS 359:161-170 (2008) - DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07344 Trophic ecology of siphonostomatoid copepods at deep-sea hydrothermal vents in the northeast Pacific H. Limén1,3,*, C. J. Stevens1,4, Z. Bourass2, S. K. Juniper1,5 1Centre GÉOTOP-UQÀM-McGill, Université du Québec à Montréal, CP 8888 Succursale Centre-Ville, Montréal, Québec H3C 3P8, Canada 2Chemistry and Biochemistry Department, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke St. W., Montréal, Québec H4B 1R6, Canada 3Present address: Research Service, The Swedish Parliament, 100 12 Stockholm, Sweden 4Present address: National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Private Bag 14-901, Kilbirnie, Wellington, New Zealand 5Present address: School of Earth and Ocean Sciences and Department of Biology, University of Victoria, PO Box 3020, Victoria, British Columbia V8W 3N5, Canada *Email: helene.limen@riksdagen.se ABSTRACT: Siphonostomatoid copepods are often numerically important at deep-sea hydrothermal vents but their role in vent food webs has been little investigated. We examined food sources of 2 vent copepod species, Stygiopontius quadrispinosus and Benthoxinus spiculifer, and their potential role in the diet of paralvinellid worms, using a combination of complementary techniques: (1) stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes, (2) fatty acid composition and (3) morphological examination of copepod mouth structures using scanning electron microscopy. All 3 techniques revealed distinct differences between the 2 copepod species. Fatty acid composition identified bacteria as the main food source for both copepod species and indicated that S. quadrispinosus may be more specialised than B. spiculifer. Stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes provided further evidence that the 2 species partition food sources but feed at the same trophic level. The fatty acid composition and stable isotopes of both paralvinellid worms showed that they are generalists, with a varied diet. Further, in samples where S. quadrispinosus were highly abundant, both worms had stable carbon and nitrogen isotopic compositions that indicated that they were feeding on copepods. Although neither worm appeared anatomically equipped for seizing live copepod prey, we suggest that dead copepods may be consumed along with other particulate debris by the paralvinellid worms. The contribution of copepod remains to the detrital pool in these mineral substratum habitats remains to be quantified. KEY WORDS: Hydrothermal vents · Copepoda · Polychaeta · Food webs · Stable isotopes · Fatty acids · Morphology · Northeast Pacific Full text in pdf format PreviousNextCite this article as: Limén H, Stevens CJ, Bourass Z, Juniper SK (2008) Trophic ecology of siphonostomatoid copepods at deep-sea hydrothermal vents in the northeast Pacific. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 359:161-170. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07344 Export citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in MEPS Vol. 359. Online publication date: May 05, 2008 Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599 Copyright © 2008 Inter-Research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".