Packing of the Cochleostomy Site Affects Auditory Nerve Response Thresholds in Precurved Off-Stylet Cochlear Implants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether packing of the cochleostomy site influences electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) thresholds. DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized control study. SETTING: Tertiary referral pediatric hospital. PATIENTS: Eleven consecutive children who received unilateral or bilateral cochlear implants (16 Nucleus 24RE Freedom precurved advanced off-stylet electrode arrays [Cochlear Corp., Lane Cove, New South Wales, Australia]) between June and September 2008. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds were evoked by stimulation of basal (electrode 3), mid (electrode 9), and apical (electrode 20) electrodes during cochlear implant surgery in the operating room. The first recording was completed immediately after insertion of the electrode array before cochleostomy packing, and the same measures were collected immediately after the packing. The time between recordings was 5 minutes. RESULTS: Electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds evoked by the apical electrode did not significantly change from pre- to post-cochleostomy packing, but ECAP thresholds increased significantly after packing when evoked by the mid-array electrode (mean, +10 clinical units; p < 0.001) and decreased significantly when evoked by the basal electrode (mean, -5.6 clinical units; p = 0.023). These changes were unrelated to passive changes occurring over the first 5 minutes after insertion of the electrode array. CONCLUSION: Packing of the cochleostomy causes changes in ECAP thresholds evoked by mid and basal areas of the implant electrode array. These findings suggest that packing shifts the electrode array in the cochlea, increasing the distance from the modiolus in the mid array and decreasing this distance at the basal end. This study is concerned with a single electrode array from a single manufacturer and a single insertion method (precurved off-stylet electrode). These conclusions may be too broad to apply to all precurved electrode arrays.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".