Phase behavior, interaction and properties of acetic acid lignin-containing polyurethane films coupled with aminopropyltriethoxy silane
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of novel acetic acid lignin-containing polyurethane (LPU) films coupled with aminopropyltriethoxy silane (APTS) (LPUSi) or the mixture of APTS and trimethylol propane (TMP) (LPUSiT) were prepared.With 2% APTS addition, the crosslinking density increased, and the resultant films were endowed with good mechanical properties and water resistance.It was also found that the hydrogen bonding interaction between -NH and -C=O of urethane was destroyed, and new hydrogen bonds between APTS and LPU were formed.However, when APTS content was greater than 4%, significant phase aggregation were detected, resulting in poor mechanical properties and water resistance.In contrast, the crosslinking density, tensile strength and water resistance can be further improved with TMP addition at 2% APTS.The simultaneous addition of APTS and TMP was beneficial for phase mixing and the formation of uniform network.And the surface morphology of LPUSiT films became smoother and more homogeneous.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".