MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966018972 · doi:10.1179/cmq.2010.49.4.411

Eh-pH Stability Diagrams for Analysis of Polyamine Interaction with Chalcopyrite and Deactivation of Cu-Activated Pyrrhotite

2010· article· en· W1966018972 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
C. Tukel, Ş. Kelebek, Emine Yalçın

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Metallurgical Quarterly · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMinerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTriethylenetetramineChemistryDiethylenetriamineChalcopyriteCopperReagentMalachiteXanthatePyrrhotiteNuclear chemistryChelationInorganic chemistryMineralogyPyriteOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractAbstractDiethylenetriamine (DETA) and/or triethylenetetramine (TETA) are reagents that can generally be categorized under 'flotation modifiers'. These polyamines are known to be effective for the deactivation/depression of pyrrhotite that is present in Canadian nickel-copper sulphide ores in large quantities. Recent bench scale testing on some of these complex ores indicated that chalcopyrite flotation can also be adversely affected under certain conditions involving polyamines. This observation is consistent with specific affinity of these reagents towards copper ions. In general, DETA shows no significant depressant action on chalcopyrite while TETA's promotion of hydrophilicity for this mineral has been observed even in the presence of xanthate. This prompted an investigation on thermodynamic equilibria involving these polyamines and copper ions. The results serve a useful purpose to identify conditions for deactivation phenomena. CuDETA2+ and CuTETA2+ chelates as products of sequestration have large predominance areas covering a wide range of redox and pH conditions, where copper xanthate species are not stable, especially in the presence of TETA. Résumé Le diéthylènetriamine (DETA) et/ou le triéthylènetétramine (TETA) sont des réactifs que l'on peut généralement catégoriser comme "modificateurs de flottation". On reconnaît que ces polyamines sont efficaces dans la désactivation/dépression de la pyrrhotine que l'on retrouve en grandes quantités dans les minerais canadiens de sulfure de nickel-cuivre. Des essais récents à l'échelle du laboratoire avec certains de ces minerais complexes ont indiqué que la flottation de la chalcopyrite pouvait également être affectée négativement sous certaines conditions impliquant des polyamines. Cette observation est compatible avec l'affinité spécifique de ces réactifs envers les ions de cuivre. En général, le DETA ne montre aucune action déprimante d'importance sur la chalcopyrite alors que l'on a observé la promotion de l'hydrophilie du TETA pour ce minéral, même en présence de xanthate. Ceci a suggéré une investigation des équilibres thermodynamiques impliquant ces polyamines et les ions de cuivre. Les résultats ont pour but utile d'identifier les conditions des phénomènes de désactivation. Les chélates CuDETA2+ et CuTETA2+, comme produits de la séquestration, ont de grandes régions de prédominance couvrant une grande gamme de conditions redox et de pH, où les espèces du xanthate de cuivre ne sont pas stables, particulièrement en présence de TETA.Keywords: DiethylenetriamineTriethylenetetramineChalcopyriteChelation equilibriaEh-pH diagrams

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.801
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Metallurgical QuarterlySame topicMinerals Flotation and Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207