Movement behaviour of adult western toads in a fragmented, forest landscape
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Habitat loss and fragmentation are among the best documented explanations for the dramatic declines amphibians are experiencing globally. The western toad ( Anaxyrus boreas (Baird and Girard, 1852)) is an IUCN red-listed species whose distribution range has been significantly affected by habitat modification. We used radiotelemetry to follow daily, postbreeding movement patterns of 23 adult male toads in a fragmented landscape near Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, composed of forest patches and small, recent clearcuts (~5 ha). Results showed that toads in forests oriented towards edges of clearcuts from at least as far as 150 m. Greater than 60% of toads released in forest patches chose to enter the clearcuts from adjacent forests, indicating high boundary permeability. Net displacement distance was not significantly reduced in these clearcuts; however, movement rates were significantly lower on clearcuts than in forest. This indicates that there is no structural impediment to movements; however, there still could be fitness consequences or an interaction with summer weather. Toads also used roads for their movement more frequently than at random relative to their area. These results suggest that the western toad’s movements may not be negatively affected by small-scale forest harvesting at our latitude during the spring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".