MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966122607 · doi:10.1353/can.2006.0006

Upholding the Land Legislation of a 'Communistic and Socialist Assembly': The Benefits of Confederation for Prince Edward Island

2006· article· en· W1966122607 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Rusty Bittermann, Margaret McCallum

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Historical Review · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegislationColonialismExpropriationLawGovernment (linguistics)Supreme courtCommissionPolitical scienceEconomic historyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most accounts of Prince Edward Island's entry into Confederation note that the federal government provided the Island with $800,000 for buying out the landlords who held large blocks of Island land, but few accounts recognize that money alone would not end landlordism if the landlords were unwilling to sell their estates. Until Confederation, landlords and the Colonial Office, acting at landlords' behest, resisted legislation to compel the landlords to sell their estates. After Confederation, landlords continued to resist, but the Colonial Office left the supervision of Island land legislation to Canada's governor general. On its second try, the Island obtained royal assent for legislation compelling the landlords to sell their estates at a price to be set by a three-person commission. When the newly created Supreme Court of Canada rejected the landlords' challenge to the awards made under the legislation, the Island was free to complete the expropriation of all large Island estates. Without the often-overlooked element of compulsion, the Island could not have used its $800,000 to create a more equitable distribution of land resources. La plupart des comptes rendus de l'entrée de l'Île-du-Prince-Édouard au sein de la confédération soulignent que le gouvernement fédéral a fourni 800 000 $ à l'Île pour faire des acquisitions auprès des propriétaires terriens qui possédaient de grandes parties des terres de l'île. Cependant, peu de ces comptes rendus reconnaissent que l'argent ne suffirait pas à mettre fin au règne des propriétaires terriens si ces derniers refusaient de vendre leurs terres. Jusqu'à la confédération, les propriétaires terriens et le ministère des Colonies, agissant pour le compte des propriétaires, ont résisté à la réglementation visant à inciter les propriétaires à vendre leurs terres. Après la confédération, les propriétaires ont continué à résister, mais le ministère des Colonies a délégué la supervision des lois relatives aux terres de l'île au Gouverneur général du Canada. Lors de sa deuxième tentative, l'Île a obtenu la sanction royale pour l'adoption d'une loi exigeant des propriétaires qu'ils vendent leurs terres à un prix qui serait établi par une commission constituée de trois personnes. Une fois que la Cour suprême du Canada, qui venait d'être créée, ai rejeté l'appel présenté par les propriétaires terriens à l'égard des prix établis en vertu de la loi, l'Île a été en mesure de terminer l'expropriation de tous les vastes domaines qui se trouvaient sur l'île. Sans cet élément d'obligation, que l'on tend souvent à négliger, l'Île n'aurait pas pu utiliser ses 800 000 $ pour obtenir une distribution plus équitable des terres.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.370
Threshold uncertainty score0.745

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0150.007
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Historical ReviewSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207