Towards Integrated Molecular Electronic Devices: Characterization of Molecular Layer Integrity During Fabrication Processes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Reproducible carbon/molecule/Cu molecular junctions are made with high yield using diazonium reduction of aromatic molecules on carbon with direct evaporation of Cu as a top contact. This report investigates the stability of these devices in response to fabrication steps. Raman spectroscopy through a transparent support shows that direct deposition of Au or Cu causes little change in molecular layer structure, while Ti and Pt deposition cause significant damage to the molecules. AFM, Raman, and XPS examination of Au, Cu, and Ti devices after removal of deposited metal confirm that Cu and Au have minimal effects on molecular structure. However, the molecular layer is rougher after Au deposition, probably due to partial penetration of Au atoms into the molecular layer. Completed carbon/molecule/Cu devices can be heated to 250 °C without significant changes in electronic behaviour while nitroazobenzene molecular layers on carbon were unaffected by photolithography or by 5 min at 400 °C in vacuum. Completed devices could be sealed with parylene‐N, stabilizing them to aqueous etching solution. The stability of carbon/molecule/Cu junctions is due, in part, to the strong carbon–carbon bonding and aggressive nature of diazonium surface modification. The results significantly expand the range of processing variables compatible with molecular electronic junctions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".