MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966164418 · doi:10.1063/1.2953698

On the local representation of the electronic momentum operator in atomic systems

2008· article· en· W1966164418 on OpenAlexaff
Hugo J. Bohórquez, Russell J. Boyd

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMomentum operatorMomentum (technical analysis)Kinetic energyPhysicsOperator (biology)ElectronAngular momentum operatorAtom (system on chip)Local density of statesQuantumQuantum mechanicsAngular momentumAngular momentum couplingTotal angular momentum quantum numberLadder operatorChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The local quantum theory is applied to the study of the momentum operator in atomic systems. Consequently, a quantum-based local momentum expression in terms of the single-electron density is determined. The limiting values of this function correctly obey two fundamental theorems: Kato's cusp condition and the Hoffmann-Ostenhof and Hoffmann-Ostenhof exponential decay. The local momentum also depicts the electron shell structure in atoms as given by its local maxima and inflection points. The integration of the electron density in a shell gives electron populations that are in agreement with the ones expected from the Periodic Table of the elements. The shell structure obtained is in agreement with the higher level of theory computations, which include the Kohn-Sham kinetic energy density. The average of the local kinetic energy associated with the local momentum is the Weizsacker kinetic energy. In conclusion, the local representation of the momentum operator provides relevant information about the electronic properties of the atom at any distance from the nucleus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207