Contribution of Cutaneous Inputs From the Hindpaw to the Control of Locomotion. I. Intact Cats
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The goal of this study was to evaluate the role of hindpaw cutaneous feedback in the control of locomotion, by cutting some (in one cat) or all (in 2 cats) cutaneous nerves bilaterally at ankle level. Kinematic and electromyographic (EMG) recordings were obtained before and for several weeks after denervation during level and incline (15 degrees up and down) treadmill walking. Ladder walking and ground reaction forces were also documented sporadically. Early after the denervation (1-3 days), cats could not walk across a ladder, although deficits were small during level treadmill walking. Increased knee flexion velocity caused a 14% reduction in swing phase duration. EMG activity was consistently increased in knee, ankle, and toe flexors, and in at least one knee or ankle extensor. The adaptive changes during walking on the incline were much reduced after denervation. Ladder walking gradually recovered within 3-7 wk. By this time, level treadmill walking kinematics had completely returned to normal, but EMG activity in flexors remained above control. Incline walking improved but did not return to normal. Mediolateral ground reaction forces during overground walking were increased by 200%. It is concluded that in intact cats, cutaneous inputs contribute more to demanding situations such as walking on a ladder or on inclines than to level walking. Active adaptive mechanisms are likely involved given that the EMG locomotor pattern never returned to control level. The companion paper shows on the other hand that when the same cats are spinalized, these cutaneous inputs become critical for foot placement during locomotion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it