The Effects of a Moderate Physical Activity Program on Thermoregulatory Responses in a Warm Environment in Men
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Moderate intensity training induces health benefits, but its influence on thermoregulatory responses during exercise in a warm environment is unclear. Twelve inactive men (mean age 24.0 +/- 6.5 yrs) underwent exercise heat tests, and peak VO2 tests, before and after a moderate training program (n= 8) or no training intervention (n = 4). Assignment to groups was random. All subjects were initially below the guidelines for physical activity set forth by Health Canada, the Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology (CSEP), and the U.S. Surgeon General. Those in the 12-week training program participated in activities such as cycling, walking, and recreational sports. Subjects were instructed to train at 50% VO2 reserve, and to gradually increase energy expenditure beyond the above mentioned recommendations. In the training group, peak VO2 increased 13%, p < 0.01, and resting peripheral blood flow during heat stress increased, p < 0.01, indicating some initial thermoregulatory benefits. No significant differences were observed in esophageal temperature or sweating threshold. Health benefits associated with thermoregulatory adaptations to exercise in a warm environment may require more vigorous exercise than recommended by current physical activity guidelines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".