MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

These Vanishing Hills

2014· article· en· W1966194985 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Steven Faulkner

Bibliographic record

VenueFourth Genre Explorations in Nonfiction · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIconCitationDownloadArt historyState (computer science)PublishingHistoryArtLibrary scienceWorld Wide WebComputer scienceLiteratureAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| August 01 2014 These Vanishing Hills Steven Faulkner Steven Faulkner Steven Faulkner has published essays in North American Review, Southern Humanities Review, DoubleTake, Texas Review, Wisconsin Trails Magazine, Beacon’s Best, and elsewhere. A movie, Waterwalk, based on his book Waterwalk: A Passage of Ghosts, has been released across the United States and Canada and on cable and is now available on DVD. A version of “These Vanishing Hills” appears in his work-in-progress, West Over the Edge of the Sky: Traveling with Lewis and Clark, Pierre Jean De Smet, and the Nez Perce. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Fourth Genre: Explorations in Nonfiction (2014) 16 (2): 41–50. https://doi.org/10.14321/fourthgenre.16.2.0041 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation Steven Faulkner; These Vanishing Hills. Fourth Genre: Explorations in Nonfiction 1 August 2014; 16 (2): 41–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.14321/fourthgenre.16.2.0041 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectiveMichigan State University PressFourth Genre: Explorations in Nonfiction Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2014 Michigan State University Press2014 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.756

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFourth Genre Explorations in NonfictionSame topicAmerican Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207