Enhancing Cooperation between India and Canada in the Era of Globalisation and Deregulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
India and Canada have maintained a dynamic and evolving relationship since India's independence. While relations had cooled off considerably following India's nuclear detonation in 1974, the year 1992 marked a turning point in the bilateral relationship. With the forces of globalisation rendering India's economic policies ineffective on the world stage, and domestic crises destroying confidence within the sub-continent, Narasimha Rao's administration embarked on a radical transformation of India's economy. India's liberalisation of its economy, which began in the early 1990s under the direction of Manmohan Singh, led to Canada's re-engaging with the subcontinent as never before. Largely economic in nature, the renewed relationship was marked by significant increases in trade, business and investment interactions, enhanced by cooperation in other areas. The last decade of the twentieth century also witnessed an increase in immigration and in cooperation in security issues and social affairs. More recently, it has been recognised that cooperation in science and technology holds great potential for mutual benefit and is already deepening the bilateral relationship. The nature of the re-engagement policy and the subsequent direction of the Indo-Canadian relationship demonstrate that, despite the nuclear detonations in 1974 and 1998, the bilateral relationship is poised for better times.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".