Design of Experiment to Evaluate Thermal Resistance of a PTAC Unit
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As a part of the “Design of Experiment” component of Thermal/Fluids Laboratory (MECH405) at Manhattan College, a setup for measuring the R-value of an Evergreen Products Model KHS-09 PTAC unit was designed by a student group. The setup consisted of the PTAC unit installed in a well insulated wall. A thermally controlled hot chamber (which simulated a hot outdoor environment) was built around the exterior side of the wall and PTAC assembly. The interior side was exposed to the lab air temperature (typically at 70°F). Thermocouples were installed on various surfaces of the setup and temperature history data were collected in order to calculate the R-value of the PTAC under different imposed temperature gradients and convection heat transfer environments. ANOVA analysis of the data showed that the R-value of the PTAC was influenced by the convective environment (free versus forced convection), and while outdoor temperature did not directly influence the R-value, an interaction existed between temperature and convection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".