High-precision U–Pb geochronology of the Butedale pluton, British ColumbiaThis article is one of a series of papers published in this Special Issue on the theme of <i>Geochronology</i> in honour of Tom Krogh.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Butedale pluton, a ca. 100 km long compositionally zoned batholith, is part of the Coast Plutonic Complex that extends the length of the Canadian Pacific coast. Its age and thermal history are relevant to the Butedale pluton’s role as a test case of the Baja–BC hypothesis, as paleomagnetic evidence suggests that it may have formed thousands of kilometres to the south and moved northward along what is now the Coast Shear Zone. High-resolution U–Pb (chemical abrasion – thermal ionization mass spectrometry (CA–TIMS), zircon) analysis of rocks across the width of the Butedale pluton indicates that it is actually made up of at least two distinct magmatic events that formed the West Butedale pluton (ca. 95 Ma) and the East Butedale pluton (ca. 85 Ma). The East Butedale pluton was reheated by the emplacement of a younger adjacent pluton, which may have caused partial Pb loss and resulting excess scatter of 206Pb/238U zircon ages within individual samples. The West Butedale pluton may be the same age as, and part of, the nearby Ecstall pluton, thereby doubling the length of the Ecstall pluton to ca. 200 km. Single-grain, high-precision U–Pb analysis of zircon reveals previously unknown complexity and detail of emplacement and thermal history in the Butedale plutons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".