MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966305435 · doi:10.2118/162843-ms

Play-Wide Well Performance Analysis in Montney Siltstone

2012· article· en· W1966305435 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsShell (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDrawdown (hydrology)SiltstonePetroleum engineeringCluster (spacecraft)ProductivityGeologyMathematicsEngineeringGeotechnical engineeringComputer scienceGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Multi-stage fractured horizontal wells (MFHW) in unconventional resource plays often present formidable reservoir management challenges, particularly with regard to capital utilization and allocation. In this study, well performance histories of some 74 wells in the Montney siltstone play were investigated with a common and consistent analytical framework. Parameters determined from the analyses are key indicators of the combined result of reservoir quality and hydraulic fracture performance (subsurface and completions). The analytical approach utilized in this study was then used to provide robust physics-based forecasts that directly recognize and incorporate interpretation non-uniqueness. Through a forecasting regimen that explicitly provides expected ranges of results, insights and conclusions in field optimization, well spacing and completions design have been drawn. A real distribution of well productivity and predicted recovery enabled identification of "sweet spots". Openhole completions technique did not show poorer performance compared to limited entry style completions, though further evaluation and surveillance would seem warranted. Wells that were flowing under a "high-drawdown" showed a lower productivity, higher completion resistance (skin) to flow, and lowest predicted final recovery. Wells completed at 50 m fracture spacing and 30 tonnes of proppant per cluster performed similarly to 100 m spacing and 60 tonnes per cluster, suggesting no apparent difference in capital efficiency between these two completion styles. Results indicate that the frac half lengths in the 50 m cluster spacing wells are shorter compared to wells with 100 m cluster spacing (based on the reduction in the amount of proppant pumped per cluster). Trends of estimated original gas-in-place inside the SRV and predicted 30-year recovery for wells drilled at close well spacings, (closer than 400 m between wellbores) indicate effects of inter-well interference. Performance of wells at 200 m well spacing seem to be affected the most by inter-well interference. A consistent workflow for analyzing well performance and predicting future performance of MFHW in unconventional gas wells is presented that provides a means to assess the impact of business and development decisions and determining practices worth replicating across the Montney play.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.353
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it