MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1966348161 · doi:10.1186/1710-1492-10-s1-a33

Powder milk as a user-friendly tool for baked milk challenge

2014· article· en· W1966348161 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Sabrine Cherkaoui, Louis Paradis, Philippe Bégin, Anne Des Roches

Bibliographic record

VenueAllergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSkimmed milkFood scienceToned milkWhole milkMilk productsMilk allergyCow's milk allergyFood allergyMedicineAllergyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cow’s milk allergy is the most common food allergy among children. Previous studies have reported that up to 75% of children may tolerate baked milk goods. Various forms of baked milk challenges have been used in the literature such as muffins, pizza, and waffles. However, the food used for baked milk challenge is often prepared in a non-standardized manner by the parents at home, raising concerns with regards to validity, reproducibility and convenience. Instant skim milk powder is made by a food process that involves heating skim milk to up to 200°C for up to 30 minutes which should be sufficient to denature thermo-labile proteins. To evaluate the usefulness of skim milk powder as a convenient standardized form of baked milk challenge. All challenges to instant skim milk powder (cumulative dose of 4g proteins) performed at Sainte-Justine Hospital in Montreal, Canada between November 2008 and January 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Observed reaction rates to challenge and to subsequent home introduction were compared to previous literature using different forms of baked milk. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, skin prick tests (SPT) and specific IgE levels were compared between those that passed and those that failed the challenge. Thirty-nine children underwent an open food challenge to instant skim milk powder and thirty patients (76,9%) passed the challenge. All of those who passed the challenge successfully introduced baked milk products at home. Compared to those who were baked milk tolerant, baked milk reactive children had higher median specific IgE levels to cow’s milk (P < .0005), casein (P < .001), α-lactalbumin (P < .001) and β-lactoglobulin (P < .04). Both cohort reaction rates and characteristics were comparable to previous literature using other forms of baked milk product for challenge. Challenge with instant skim milk powder is a safe, convenient and easily standardized alternative to home baked food for baked milk challenge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAllergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology→Same topicFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research→French-language works237,207→