A greedy spectrum sharing algorithm for cognitive radio networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a novel simple heuristic algorithm for scheduling the secondary link activation and provide a dynamic spectrum sharing in cognitive radio networks. This algorithm is presented for spectrum underlay where primary and secondary users transmit simultaneously on the same frequency bands in cognitive radio networks. The proposed algorithm is based on a graph-theoretical model. First, the cognitive radio network is modeled as a weighted graph. The spectrum sharing problem is then reduced to the one of finding a sensitive vertex coloring of the constructed graph. The spectrum sharing decisions are taken at the level of a spectrum server that coordinates the secondary transmissions in order to find the best transmission/spectrum pairs in terms of system sum rate. The spectrum server is also responsible for protecting the transmission of primary users from harmful interference via assigning appropriate transmitting power to the activated secondary transmissions. We show through simulations the gain that the proposed algorithm can extract in terms of system sum rate from the transmission selection diversity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it