Gas‐phase olefin polymerization over supported metallocene/MAO catalysts: influence of support on activity and polydispersity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Three catalysts obtained by supporting bis( n ‐butylcyclopentadienyl)zirconium dichloride/methylaluminoxane on: (1) porous crosslinked poly(2‐hydroxyethylmethacrylate‐ co ‐styrene‐ co ‐divinylbenzene) particles (CAT1); (2) swellable crosslinked poly(styrene‐ co ‐divinylbenzene) particles (CAT2); and (3) by evaporating the catalyst precursors solution to dry powder, CAT3 were used in gas‐phase polymerization of ethylene, and ethylene/1‐hexene in a 2 L semi‐batch reactor at 80 °C and 1.4 MPa. The average polymerization activities of the three catalysts were 12.3–15.5, 4.2–10.1, and 14.3–62.9 ton PE (mol Zr h) −1 respectively. CAT1 and CAT3 produced polyethylenes with a polydispersity range of 2.3–2.7, while that of CAT2 was 3.5–6.4. The supported catalysts produced polyolefin particles with bulk density of 0.36–0.43 g ml −1 , and essentially no fines. Ethylene/1‐hexene co‐polymerization (7 mol m −3 initial 1‐hexene concentration in the reactor) increased polymerization activities and produced lower‐molar‐mass co‐polymers. At 21 mol m −3 1‐hexene the polymerization activities decreased, but the relative amount of the low‐molar‐mass co‐polymer for CAT2 increased, leading to higher polydispersity. Copyright © 2006 Society of Chemical Industry
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it