MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966460546 · doi:10.1063/1.1498821

Cahn–Hoffman capillarity vector thermodynamics for curved liquid crystal interfaces with applications to fiber instabilities

2002· article· en· W1966460546 on OpenAlexaff
Ae-Gyeong Cheong, Alejandro D. Rey

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLiquid Crystal Research Advancements
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapillary actionLiquid crystalCurvatureIsotropyMaterials scienceAnisotropyInstabilitySurface energyThermodynamicsClassical mechanicsMechanicsPhysicsCondensed matter physicsOpticsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Cahn–Hoffman capillarity vector thermodynamics for curved anisotropic interfaces is adapted to soft liquid crystalline interfaces. The formalism is used to derive Herring’s capillary pressure equation for anisotropic surfaces, where the role of anchoring energy of liquid crystals is made explicity. It is shown in detail that liquid crystal interfaces have three distinct contributions to capillary pressure: (i) area reduction, (ii) area rotation, and (iii) orientation curvature. General expressions representing these three mechanisms in terms of isotropic and anisotropic surface tensions are derived and used to analyze the Rayleigh capillary instability in thin fibers. It is shown that liquid crystal fibers and filaments are unstable to peristaltic and chiral surface ripple modes. The peristaltic mode leads to droplet formation, while chiral modes produce ripples in the curvature of the fiber. The role of liquid crystal orientation and anchoring energy on mode selection is elucidated and quantified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicLiquid Crystal Research AdvancementsFrench-language works237,207