MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966489033 · doi:10.1038/ncprheum0652

Primer: administrative health databases in observational studies of drug effects—advantages and disadvantages

2007· review· en· W1966489033 on OpenAlexaff
Samy Suissa, Edeltraut Garbe

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Clinical Practice Rheumatology · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityRoyal Victoria HospitalMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObservational studyMedicineDatabasePharmacoepidemiologyPharmacyConfoundingClinical study designRofecoxibRandomized controlled trialMEDLINEIntensive care medicineClinical trialData scienceRisk analysis (engineering)Medical prescriptionPharmacologyFamily medicineComputer scienceSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.071
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.221
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0710.221
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0070.012
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.009
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0060.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.268
GPT teacher head0.607
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainMethods
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations180
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNature Clinical Practice RheumatologySame topicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effectsFrench-language works237,207