Gartland Type I Supracondylar Humerus Fractures in Children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to determine if Gartland type I supracondylar humerus (SCH) fractures undergo significant displacement resulting in a change in management when treated with a long-arm splint. Secondary objectives included measured changes at follow-up in displacement and/or angulation. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of children who presented with elbow injuries to a children's hospital. Patients were included if they were diagnosed with a Gartland type I SCH fracture, managed with a long-arm splint, and had at least 1 follow-up visit 2 to 3 weeks from the emergency department visit. The primary outcome was the proportion of cases that required the placement of a circumferential cast and/or an operative intervention. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of cases with significant changes in displacement on any view, Baumann or the lateral humerocapitellar angle, and/or category of position of anterior humeral line relative to capitellum. RESULTS: Of 804 elbow injuries that presented from 2003 to 2008, 53 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age of the patients was 4.1 years (interquartile range, 3.4-6.1 years) years. Of the 53, there were no cases that required a change in management. One case had a change in the humerocapitellar angle, and another had a change of 1 category in position of the capitellum relative to the anterior humeral line. There were no other cases of significant changes in displacement or angulation. CONCLUSIONS: These data support that Gartland type I SCH fractures can be treated effectively with long-arm posterior splinting for the duration of therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".