MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966518280 · doi:10.1021/ma060921f

Low-Fouling Amine-Terminated Poly(ethylene glycol) Thin Layers and Effect of Immobilization Conditions on Their Mechanical and Physicochemical Properties

2006· article· en· W1966518280 on OpenAlexafffund
Yves Martin, Patrick Vermette

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Surface Interaction Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsQuartz crystal microbalanceEthylene glycolPolymerChemical engineeringX-ray photoelectron spectroscopySolventPEG ratioAmine gas treatingMaterials scienceFoulingChemistryPolymer chemistryOrganic chemistryMembraneAdsorption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The physicochemical and mechanical properties of amine-terminated covalently bound poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) layers are dependent on fabrication methods. In particular, the use of a ϑ solvent yields dense polymer layers with properties not well described by traditional models. Light diffraction techniques were used in an attempt to understand the influence of polymer aggregation kinetics in a ϑ solvent on the final properties of the fabricated PEG layers. The polymer layer properties were characterized using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), atomic force microscopy (AFM) in force mode, quartz crystal microbalance (QCM), and fluorescence microscopy. Results show that polymer concentration in solution is an important indicator of final layer properties and that the use of a ϑ solvent induces complex aggregation phenomena in solution yielding layers with widely different properties. The PEG layers fabricated through the process described in this article are also shown to present chemically available primary amine groups, paving the way for the immobilization of bioactive molecules.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.549

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicPolymer Surface Interaction StudiesFrench-language works237,207