Potential beneficial as well as detrimental effects of chronic treatment with lisinopril and (or) spironolactone on isolated hearts following low-flow ischemia in normal and infarcted rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study was designed to demonstrate potential beneficial as well as detrimental effects of lisinopril and spironolactone given in combination. In patients with congestive heart failure or myocardial infarction, the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors may inhibit aldosterone production. Spironolactone, a specific aldosterone receptor antagonist may exert other independent and additive effects to those of ACE inhibitors. Given the consequences of aldosterone on ischemic hearts, we evaluated the protective effects of spironolactone or lisinopril and combined spironolactone-lisinopril therapy during low-flow ischemia and reperfusion in isolated rat hearts. Normal and infarcted (left coronary artery ligature) male Wistar rats were submitted to chronic action of drugs (0.8 mg.kg-1.day-1 for lisinopril and 8 or 50 mg.kg-1.day-1 for spironolactone) for 1 month. Hearts were rapidly excised and perfused (constant pressure) for a 40-min period of stabilization followed by a 25-min period of global low-flow ischemia and a 30-min reperfusion. In normal rats, spironolactone decreased ischemic and reperfusion contracture, reduced ventricular tachycardia, suppressed action-potential duration dispersion, and increased reactive hyperemia leading to an improvement of contractile recovery. Lisinopril also decreased ventricular tachycardia and action-potential duration dispersion concomitantly with increased reactive hyperemia and better contractile recovery. These beneficial effects of the drugs were lost when the two treatments were combined (lisinopril and 50 mg.kg-1.day-1 spironolactone), despite a synergistic effect on plasmatic K+ and Mg2+. However, an interaction between the ACE inhibitor and spironolactone potentiating the effects of either drug alone was observed with a lower dose of spironolactone (lisinopril and 8 mg.kg-1.day-1 spironolactone). Similar beneficial effects have been noted in infarcted rat hearts on reactive hyperemia, ventricular tachycardia, and contractile recovery with the combined treatment and for both spironolactone concentrations (8 or 50 mg). Chronic spironolactone treatment produces similar beneficial effects to ACE inhibitor treatment on normal rat hearts during an ischemia-reperfusion protocol. Synergistic effects have been observed with the combined therapy when a lower dose of spironolactone was utilized in normal and infarcted rats. However, in the case of a high dose of spironolactone, the two effective drugs seem to cancel each other but only in normal rats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".