Developmental outcome of children who had choroid plexus cysts detected prenatally
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate cognitive, motor, language and adaptive behavior development in children who had isolated choroid plexus cysts (CPC) detected prenatally. METHODS: A retrospective double cohort design and standardized psychometric measures were used to compare the development of children who had isolated CPCs identified prenatally with a control group of children who had normal prenatal ultrasounds. RESULTS: Our study cohort (n = 37) had a mean age of 3.88 years (SD = 0.83) and the control cohort (n = 48) had a mean age of 4.62 years (SD = 1.03). The age difference between our cohorts was significant. There were no differences between cohorts in socioeconomic status, sex, birth weight or gestational age. Cognitive data showed no clinically significant difference in Full Scale IQ using the WISC-III or WPPSI-R (CPC = 113.97, control = 116.69). Scores on standardized measures of motor and adaptive functioning also did not show any significant group differences. Children with CPCs did score significantly lower than controls on some of the measures of verbal functioning; however, this difference was not associated with clinically significant delays. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the presence of isolated CPCs on midtrimester ultrasound are unlikely to be associated with any significant neurocognitive delays in early childhood.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".