"In Christo ist weder man noch weyb“: Frauen in der Zeit der Reformation und der katholischen Reform (review)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nearly every one of these ten essays sets out research topics that urgently need treatment. The relative lack of scholarship on women's responses to the Reformation, including the Catholic Reform, is itself a salient theme of this collection. Although in the list of authors, many of the contributors are styled as [End Page 510] theologians--and several, too, as historians--their work here is not on religious ideas in the abstract but rather the practical implications of the Reformation for women's everyday existence. Several essays are elementary surveys that may be useful in the Germanophone undergraduate classroom but will tell the expert nothing new. Indeed, as Nicole Grochowina (pp. 95-113) concedes, in her consideration of the scope for women's action in the Anabaptist movement, that [North] American research is farthest along. Alas, even at that, C. Arnold Snyder and Linda A. Huebert Hecht, Profiles of Anabaptist Women (Waterloo, Ontario, 1996) has eluded her.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".