MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966634223 · doi:10.1021/om0500117

Direct Detection of 1,1-Diphenyl-2-neopentylsilene and the Effects of Solvent Polarity on Its Reactivity with Nucleophiles

2005· article· en· W1966634223 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas R. Owens, J. Grinyer, William J. Leigh

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganometallics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicFluorine in Organic Chemistry
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryNucleophileReactivity (psychology)Solvent polarityPolarity (international relations)SolventSolvent effectsComputational chemistryMedicinal chemistryPhotochemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reactivity of the transient silene 1,1-diphenyl-2-neopentylsilene ( 4 ) has been studied in various solvents by laser flash photolysis methods, using trans -1,1,3,3-tetraphenyl-2,4-dineopentyl-1,3-disilacyclobutane as the precursor. Silene 4 exhibits a lifetime of ca. 250 μs and a UV absorption maximum of λ max = 335 nm (ε = 10000 ± 2900 M - 1 cm - 1 ) in dry, deoxygenated hexane, where it undergoes head-to-tail dimerization and reacts with oxygen with absolute rate constants of k dim = (5 ± 2) × 10 8 M - 1 s - 1 and k O2 = (6.5 ± 0.8) × 10 5 M - 1 s - 1, respectively. Identical absorption maxima are exhibited by 4 in 1,2-dichloroethane, tetrahydrofuran, and acetonitrile solution, indicating that the silene does not form detectable Lewis acid−base complexes with these solvents, thus making it possible to study the effects of solvent polarity on silene reactivity for the first time. Accordingly, absolute rate constants for reaction of 4 with acetone, methanol, acetic acid, 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol, and n -butylamine have been determined as a function of temperature in two or more of the four solvents. The results are compared to previously reported data for 1,1-diphenylsilene ( 2a ) and show that the 2-neopentyl substituent in 4 enhances the reactivity of the Si C bond with oxygen, but reduces its reactivity with nucleophilic reagents and toward [2+2]-dimerization by as much as a factor of 10 3 . As with 2a, the Arrhenius parameters for the reactions of 4 are consistent with stepwise mechanisms, initiated by reversible complexation between the nucleophile and the silene, followed by H-transfer. The absolute rate constants at 25 °C vary by only a factor of 3−10 with solvent in each case, but there is a general trend toward increasingly positive Arrhenius activation energies and pre-exponential factors with increasing solvent polarity. The mechanistic ramifications of these results are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganometallicsSame topicFluorine in Organic ChemistryFrench-language works237,207