Comparative study of spiculogenesis in demosponge and hexactinellid larvae
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spicule deposition was studied by electron microscopy in fixed embryos and larvae of the haplosclerid sponge Reniera sp. and the hexactinellid Oopsacas minuta. Spicules form in centrally located vacuoles within cells and within syncytia, as in the adult sponges. In Reniera, scleroblasts differentiate from micromeres prior to gastrulation. At gastrulation the scleroblasts migrate to the periphery of the embryo and commence spicule deposition around a hexagonal axial filament. Sclerocytes have numerous pseudopodia and migrate to the posterior pole where they become aligned along the antero-posterior axis in the free-swimming larva. Reniera larvae possess some 40-50 oxeas, each 70-75 microm long and 1 microm wide. Mature Oopsacas larvae have up to 14 stauractin spicules, which are produced on a rectangular axial filament in tissues that lie under the smooth epithelium at the posterior pole of the larva. Young sclerocytes have many pseudopodia. The 4-rayed spicules elongate along both the antero-posterior and medial axes, until the longitudinal rays become anchored in a lipid-filled cytoplasm at the anterior of the larva and the lateral rays intersect around the midline. The length of the transverse rays of the stauractins in free-swimming larvae are 27-45 microm each, while the length of the two longitudinal rays is 40-80 microm. Although spicule deposition begins in cells with a similar morphology in both cellular and syncytial sponges, the elaboration and organization of the spicules differ markedly in cellular and syncytial sponges and appear to be an outcome of the very distinct cellular differentiation and larval morphogenesis that occur in each of these groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".