MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966682478 · doi:10.1139/p00-061

Ground-state analysis of the Falicov-Kimball model on complete graphs

2000· article· en· W1966682478 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Oscar Bolina, Domingos H. U. Marchetti

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum and electron transport phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsBipartite graphGround stateEigenvalues and eigenvectorsElectronThermodynamic limitLimit (mathematics)Dimension (graph theory)Function (biology)Energy (signal processing)Quantum mechanicsMathematical physicsCombinatoricsMathematical analysisMathematicsGraph

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ground-state nature of the Falicov–Kimball model of mobile electrons and fixed nuclei on complete graphs is investigated. We give a pedagogic derivation of the eigenvalue problem and present a complete account of the ground-state energy both as a function of the number of electrons and nuclei and as a function of the total number of particles for any value of interaction U [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text]. We also study the energy gap and show the existence of a phase transition characterized by the absence of gap at the half-filled band for U < 0. The model in consideration was proposed and partially solved by Farkasovsky for finite graphs and repulsive on-site interaction U > 0. Contrary to his proposal, we conveniently scale the hopping matrix to guarantee the existence of the thermodynamic limit. We also solve this model on bipartite complete graphs and examine how sharp the Kennedy–Lieb variational estimate is as compared with the exact ground state. PACS Nos.: 71.2-b, 02.10Gd

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicQuantum and electron transport phenomenaFrench-language works237,207