MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Predisposition to Pediatric and Hematologic Cancers: A Moving Target

2014· review· en· W1966738941 on OpenAlexfundno aff
David Malkin, Kim E. Nichols, Kristin Zelley, Joshua D. Schiffman

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineCancerGenetic predispositionLeukemiaLi–Fraumeni syndromePopulationOncologyInternal medicineDiseaseGermline mutationMutationGeneticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our understanding of hereditary cancer syndromes in children, adolescents, and young adults continues to grow. In addition, we now recognize the wide variation in tumor spectrum found within each specific cancer predisposition syndrome including the risk for hematologic malignancies. An increased understanding of the genetic mutations, biologic consequences, tumor risk, and clinical management of these syndromes will improve patient outcome. In this article, we illustrate the diversity of molecular mechanisms by which these disorders develop in both children and adults with a focus on Li-Fraumeni syndrome, hereditary paraganglioma syndrome, DICER1 syndrome, and multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome. This is followed by a detailed discussion of adult-onset tumors that can occur in the pediatric population including basal cell carcinoma, colorectal cancer, medullary thyroid cancer, and adrenal cortical carcinoma, and the underlying hereditary cancer syndromes that these tumors could indicate. Finally, the topic of leukemia predisposition syndromes is explored with a specific focus on the different categories of syndromes associated with leukemia risk (genetic instability/DNA repair syndromes, cell cycle/differentiation, bone marrow failure syndromes, telomere maintenance, immunodeficiency syndromes, and transcription factors/pure familial leukemia syndromes). Throughout this article, special attention is made to clinical recognition of these syndromes, genetic testing, and management with early tumor surveillance and screening.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.522
Teacher spread0.421 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology Educational BookSame topicNeuroblastoma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207