Multi‐functional initiator and poly(carboxybetaine methacrylamides) for building biocompatible surfaces using “nitroxide mediated free radical polymerization” strategies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Biomaterials generally suffer from rapid nonspecific protein adsorption, which initiates many deleterious host responses, and complex chemistries that are employed to facilitate cellular interactions. A chemical approach that, based upon current literature, combines a nonfouling architecture with a biomemtic cell‐adhesive end‐group, is presented. Namely, surface‐initiated polymerization of zwitterionic [poly (carboxybetaine methacrylamide)] brushes, with controlled charge densities and phosphonate head groups. Nitroxide mediated free radical polymerization (NMFRP) was employed for various reasons: reduces presence of potentially cytotoxic organometallic catalysts common in atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP); and it allows a phosphonate end‐group instead of the common brominated end‐group. Thermally oxidized silicon wafers were covalently functionalized with diethyl‐(1‐(N‐(1‐(3‐(trimethoxysilyl)propylcarbamoyl)ethoxy)‐N‐tert‐butylamino)ethyl)phosphonate. NMFRP was used to graft zwitterionic carboxybetaine methacrylamide monomers of varying inter‐charge separation. The resulting thin films were characterized using Attenuated Total Reflectance‐Fourier Transform Infrared (ATR‐FTIR) and X‐ray photoelectron (XPS) spectroscopy, ellipsometry, water contact angle analysis, and thermo gravimetric analysis (TGA). The effect of spacer group on the surface charge density was determined using zeta potential techniques. It is thought that this stratagem will facilitate the ability to tailor systematically both the interior and terminal polymer properties, providing a platform for further understanding how these conditions affect protein adsorption as well as cell‐surface interactions. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem, 2011
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".