A Heteromeric Complex of the Two Nucleotide Binding Domains of Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) Mediates ATPase Activity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein is a member of the ABC superfamily of transporter proteins. Recently, crystal structures of intact, prokaryotic members of this family have been described. These structures suggested that ATP binding and hydrolysis occurs at two sites formed at the interface between their nucleotide binding domains (NBDs). In contrast to the prokaryotic family members, the NBDs of CFTR are asymmetric (both structurally and functionally), and previous to the present studies, it was not clear whether both NBDs are required for ATP hydrolysis. In order to assess the relative roles of the two NBDs of human CFTR, we purified and reconstituted NBD1 and NBD2, separately and together. We found that NBD1 and NBD2 by themselves exhibited relatively low ATPase activity. Co-assembly of NBD1 and NBD2 exhibited a 2-3-fold enhancement in catalytic activity relative to the isolated domains and this increase reflected enhanced ATP turnover (V(max)). These data provide the first direct evidence that heterodimerization of the NBD1 and NBD2 domains of CFTR is required to generate optimal catalytic activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".