The natural history of hepatitis C virus infection acquired during childhood
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The outcome of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection acquired during childhood in the absence of antiviral therapy is not clear. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to review the outcome of untreated HCV acquired in childhood. Only population-based studies were included, as referred cases would be predicted to have more severe disease. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was completed up to October 2010 to identify studies where a population was screened for HCV infection that was presumably acquired during childhood. Demographical and clinical data were collected on infected patients who had not been treated with an antiviral. Primary outcome was development of a severe adverse outcome (cirrhosis, hepatoma, need for a liver transplant or liver-related death). RESULTS: There were 25 studies reporting a total of 733 infected patients. Liver biopsy results were provided for 180 patients (25%), revealing cirrhosis in eight (1.0% of the total and 4.0% of those who had a biopsy). None of the other patients developed a severe adverse outcome. As a result of the small number of patients with a severe adverse outcome, risk factors for HCV progression could not be identified. CONCLUSION: Although HCV can lead to liver transplantation and death during childhood, the vast majority of patients with disease acquired during childhood have slowly progressive disease. There is no clear indication for antiviral therapy in the majority of children with HCV infection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".