Identification of a novel partner gene, <i>TPR</i>, fused to <i>FGFR1</i> in 8p11 myeloproliferative syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 8p11 myeloproliferative syndrome (EMS) is an aggressive neoplasm caused by the fusion of various partner genes to fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1). Various FGFR1 fusions are associated with subtly distinct disease phenotypes. Here, we report a new translocation at the FGFR1 locus in a patient who carried t(1;8)(q25;p11.2) and presented with myeloproliferative neoplasm-like symptoms. The patient was characterized by myeloid hyperplasia of bone marrow, markedly elevated numbers of monocytes, and normal to mildly elevated eosinophils. Initial fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis confirmed that FGFR1 in this patient was disrupted. Subsequent analysis led to the identification of a novel translocation, in which exon 23 of the translocated promoter region (TPR) gene at chromosome band 1q25 was fused to exon 13 of FGFR1 (RefSeq NM_0231102.2). The TPR portion of the fusion protein contains putative functional motifs including an N-terminal TprMet domain, nuclear pore complexes associating domain, and multiple coiled-coil domains. It is likely that one or more of the motifs from TPR contribute to dimerization, resulting in constitutive activation of the FGFR1 kinase domain. Our results further support a critical role of FGFR1 in the pathogenesis of EMS and may lead to more accurate diagnosis and potential targeted therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".